World Journal of Oncology, ISSN 1920-4531 print, 1920-454X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, World J Oncol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.wjon.org

Original Article

Volume 10, Number 6, December 2019, pages 218-225


Combining Prostate-Specific Antigen Parameters With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score Version 2.0 to Improve Its Diagnostic Accuracy

Figure

Figure 1.
Figure 1. ROC curve analysis of PIRADS score criteria to determine CSPCa. ROC: receiver operating characteristic; PIRADS: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System; CSPCa: clinically significant prostate cancer.

Tables

Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of Patients With Suspected PCa, Patients With PCa and Patients With BPH
 
CharacteristicsPatients with suspected PCa (n = 104)Patients with PCa (n = 64)Patients with BPH (n = 40)P value*
Data shown as median (interquartile range), range. Unless otherwise specified. *Comparison between patients with PCa and patients with BPH. BPH: benign prostatic hyperplasia; DRE: digital rectal examination; PCa: prostate cancer; PSA: prostate-specific antigen; PSAD: prostate-specific antigen density; TRUS: transrectal ultrasound; USG: ultrasound sonography.
Age (years)68 (60.25 - 71)
45 - 85
68 (62 - 71)65.5 (54.25 - 70)0.009
PSA level (ng/mL)8.15 (6.4 - 9.7)
4.1 - 10
9.05 (7.73 - 9.9)6.4 (5.5 - 7.8)< 0.001
Prostate volume (mL)60 (44 - 75)
27 - 123
50 (43.25 - 60.75)75 (56.75 - 94)< 0.001
PSAD (ng/mL2)0.13 (0.09 - 0.18)
0.05 - 0.27
0.16 (0.13 - 0.21)0.09 (0.08 - 0.11)< 0.001
Free/total PSA ratio (%)21.5 (14.52 - 29.92)
5.5 - 44
16.75 (12.58-23)30 (23.75 - 35)< 0.001
Suspicious DRE, n (%)17 (16.3)12 (18.8)5 (12.5)0.402
Hypoechoic lesion in TRUS/USG, n (%)5 (4.8)5 (7.8)0 (0)0.070

 

Table 2. Comparison of Demographic Data Between Patients in CSPCa Group and Patients in Non-CSPCa Group (Having Insignificant Cancer or BPH)
 
VariablesCSPCa group (n = 44)Non-CSPCa group (n = 60)P value
Data shown as median (interquartile range), range. Unless otherwise specified. CSPCa: clinically significant PCa; BPH: benign prostatic hyperplasia; DRE: digital rectal examination; PCa: prostatic cancer; PSA: prostate-specific antigen; PSAD: prostate-specific antigen density; TRUS: transrectal ultrasound; USG: ultrasound sonography.
Age (years)70 (63.25 - 73.75)66 (59 - 70)0.001
PSA level (ng/mL)9.6 (8.43 - 10)6.95 (5.5 - 8.4)< 0.001
Prostate volume (mL)44.5 (40.25 - 59.15)70 (56 - 89.75)< 0.001
PSAD (ng/mL2)0.20 (0.16 - 0.22)0.10 (0.08 - 0.12)< 0.001
Free/total PSA ratio (%)14.25 (11.08 - 18.73)28 (21.25 - 33)< 0.001
DRE positive, n (%)7 (15.9)10 (16.7)0.918
USG/TRUS positive, n (%)4 (9.1)1 (1.7)0.080

 

Table 3. Comparison of PIRADS Score Between Patients in CSPCa Group and Patients in Non-CSPCa Group (Having Insignificant Cancer or BPH)
 
Multiparametric MRI resultsCSPCa group (n = 44)Non-CSPCa group (n = 60)P value
Data shown as n (%). *PIRADS score 3, 4 or 5 is considered as a positive test. CSPCa: clinically significant prostate cancer; BPH: benign prostatic hyperplasia; PIRAD: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging.
PIRADS (+)*38 (86.4)32 (53.3)< 0.001
PIRADS score 12 (4.5)7 (11.7)< 0.001
PIRADS score 23 (6.8)21 (35)
PIRADS score 36 (13.6)22 (36.7)
PIRADS score 411 (25)7 (11.7)
PIRADS score 522 (50)3 (5)

 

Table 4. ROC Curve Analysis for Predicting Clinically Significant PCa for Each Factor
 
ParametersAUC of ROC curve95% confidence intervalP value
AUC: area under the ROC curve; PCa: prostatic cancer; DRE: digital rectal examination; PIRADS: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System; PSA: prostate-specific antigen; PSAD: prostate-specific antigen density; ROC: receiver operating characteristic; TRUS: transrectal ultrasound; USG: ultrasound sonography.
Age0.6840.582 - 0.7850.001
DRE0.4960.383 - 0.6090.948
USG/TRUS0.5370.423 - 0.6510.519
Serum PSA0.8270.744 - 0.909< 0.001
Prostate volume0.8300.753 - 0.907< 0.001
PSAD0.9680.941 - 0.996< 0.001
Free/total PSA ratio (%)0.8550.776 - 0.935< 0.001
PIRADS score V20.8220.734 - 0.909< 0.001

 

Table 5. Univariate and Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis of Factors Associated With Clinically Significant PCa in Patients With Suspected PCa
 
ParametersOdds ratio (95% CI)P value
PCa: prostatic cancer; DRE: digital rectal examination; PIRADS: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System; PSA: prostate-specific antigen; PSAD: prostate-specific antigen density; TRUS: transrectal ultrasound; USG: ultrasound sonography.
Age
  Univariate1.101 (1.038 - 1.67)0.001
  Multivariate1.157 (1.008 - 1.327)0.038
DRE (+)0.946 (0.329 - 2.717)0.918
TRUS/USG (+)0.169 (0.018 - 1.573)0.118
Prostate volume0.916 (0.882 - 0.950)< 0.001
Serum PSA
  Univariate1.929 (1.442 - 2.580)< 0.001
  Multivariate0.930 (0.571 - 1.515)0.772
PSAD
  Univariate2.090 (1.559 - 2.802)< 0.001
  Multivariate2.033 (1.466 - 2.819)< 0.001
Free/total PSA ratio (%)
  Univariate0.843 (0.787 - 0.902)< 0.001
  Multivariate0.939 (0.846 - 1.043)0.243
PIRADS V25.542 (2.04 - 15.053)0.001

 

Table 6. PIRADS Score Criteria Used in the Study
 
CriteriaPostive testNegative testRemarks
PIRADS: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System; fPSA: free/total PSA ratio; PSA: prostate-specific antigen; PSAD: prostate-specific antigen density.
1Score 3,4 or 5Score 1 or 2Standard
2Score 4, 5 or (3+ PSAD > 0.12 ng/mL2)Score 1, 2 or (3+ PSAD ≤ 0.12 ng/mL2 )Combining present study cut-off of PSAD with score 3
3Score 4, 5 or (3+ fPSA ≤ 25.5%)Score 1, 2 or (3+ fPSA > 25.5%)Combining present study cut-off of fPSA with score 3
4Score 4 or 5Score 1, 2 or 3Score 3 taken as a negative test due to high rate of false positive in this study when score 3 is taken as positive.

 

Table 7. Diagnostic Evaluation of PIRADS Score in Predicting CSPCa in Patients With Suspected PCa Using Criterion 1, Criterion 2 and Criterion 3
 
Clinical groupClinically significant PCa with PIRADS scoring
Criteria 1Criteria 2Criteria 3Criteria 4
Data shown as percentage (95% CI). CI: confidence interval; fPSA: free/total prostate specific antigen ratio; PCa: prostate cancer; PIRADS: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System; PSAD: prostate-specific antigen density; CSPCa: clinically significant prostate cancer.
Sensitivity88.64 (75.44 - 96.21)85.19 (72.88 - 93.38)82.81 (71.32 - 91.10)75.00 (59.66 - 86.81)
Specificity46.67 (33.67 - 60.00)86.00 (73.26 - 94.18)77.50 (61.55 - 89.16)83.33 (71.48 - 91.71)
Positive likelihood ratio1.66 (1.28 - 2.15)6.08 (3.03 - 12.20)3.68 (2.05 - 6.61)4.50 (2.49 - 8.13)
Negative likelihood ratio0.24 (0.10 - 0.58)0.17 (0.09 - 0.33)0.22 (0.13 - 0.39)0.30 (0.18 - 0.51)
Disease prevalence42.31 (32.68 - 52.39)42.31 (32.68 - 52.39)42.31 (32.68 - 52.39)42.31 (32.68 - 52.39)
Positive predictive value54.93 (48.46 - 61.23)86.79 (76.62 - 92.95)85.48 (76.62 - 91.36)76.74 (64.63 - 85.63)
Negative predictive value84.85 (70.15 - 93.03)84.31 (73.74 - 91.14)73.81 (61.61 - 83.19)81.97 (72.91 - 88.48)
Accuracy64.42 (54.43 - 73.57)85.58 (77.33 - 91.70)80.77 (71.87 - 87.84)79.81 (70.81 - 87.04)

 

Table 8. Summary of ROC Curve Analysis
 
PIRADS score criteriaAUC of ROC curveP value95% confidence interval
Lower boundUpper bound
AUC: area under the ROC curve; PIRADS: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System; ROC: receiver operating characteristic.
Criteria 10.6650.0040.5610.769
Criteria 20.827< 0.0010.7430.910
Criteria 30.732< 0.0010.6340.829
Criteria 40.792< 0.0010.6990.884