World J Oncol
World Journal of Oncology, ISSN 1920-4531 print, 1920-454X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, World J Oncol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.wjon.org

Case Report

Volume 3, Number 2, April 2012, pages 73-77


Occult Breast Cancer Presenting as Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis

Megan E. McNallya, b, William Carsona

aDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, USA
bCorresponding author: Megan E. McNally, N924 Doan Hall, 410 W. 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

Manuscript accepted for publication November 2, 2011
Short title: Occult Breast Cancer Presenting
doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/wjon408w

Abstract▴Top 

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is a rare and devastating metastatic manifestation of both liquid and solid tumors consisting of dissemination of malignant cells with invasion into the meninges. Few options exist in most clinical situations, especially when LC is the presenting sign of occult malignancy. The prognosis is often poor with limited survival. Aims of palliation must be considered the primary goal for most patients. We report a case in which occult metastatic breast cancer presented with neurological symptoms from LC. We discuss diagnosing the primary malignancy when LC is the presenting manifestation as well as treatment, both palliative and cytoreductive. We also focus on those patients with breast cancer that are at highest risk of developing LC.

Keywords: Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis; Palliation

Introduction▴Top 

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is a rare and devastating metastatic manifestation of both liquid and solid tumors consisting of dissemination of malignant cells with invasion into the meninges. Rarely is it the presenting symptom of malignancy; however, when it is, it can be difficult to define the primary tumor of origin and survival is limited [1].

Case Report▴Top 

A 33 year old woman presented to the Emergency Department with bifrontal headaches and blurry vision. Her past medical history was significant for Crohn’s disease which required a subtotal colectomy; she was not on any medications at presentation. Physical examination was without additional abnormalities. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head revealed an enhancing pineal gland mass (Fig.1 and 2, large arrow) and obstructive hydrocephalus. These findings were concerning for either a primary or secondary brain malignancy. Cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) examination revealed malignant cells from an unknown primary.

Figure 1.
Click for large image
Figure 1. MRI brain (saggital) reveals obstructive hydrocephalus caused by an enhancing pineal gland mass (large arrow) and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) (small arrow).

Figure 2.
Click for large image
Figure 2. MRI brain (transversal) reveals obstructive hydrocephalus caused by an enhancing pineal gland mass (large arrow) and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) (small arrow).

The patient was admitted, and a ventriculostomy was placed to treat the hydrocephalus. When the patient stabilized, she received whole brain external beam radiation (3000 cGy in 10 fractions), which resulted in improvement of her vision. MRI defined the pineal gland metastasis and LC as the cause for the hydrocephalus (Fig. 1 and 2, small arrow). The LC progressed despite radiation necessitating the conversion of the ventriculostomy to a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt for the persistent symptomatic hydrocephalus.

Work up to define the primary malignancy included physical exam, upper and lower endoscopy, lab studies, chest x-ray, CT of the abdomen and pelvis, and CSF cytology. A spinal MRI to evaluate the degree of LC noted concerning areas in the breasts. Diffuse activity in both breasts was noted on CT/PET. A breast MRI and ultrasound confirmed the presence of bilateral breast masses suspicious for multi-centric breast cancer. These were not appreciable on initial physical examination due to severe fibrocystic disease. An ultrasound-guided biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of breast cancer. The final pathology was consistent with an invasive carcinoma, favoring mammary ductal type with areas suspicious for lymphovascular invasion. The tumor was triple receptor (estrogen, progesterone, HER2/neu) negative.

After multidisciplinary discussion, it was decided that intrathecal cytotoxic chemotherapy would not be beneficial due to extensive LC and persistent obstructive hydrocephalus. Instead, high dose intravenous methotrexate was initiated to treat the patient’s neurologic metastases. She tolerated two treatments at a dose of 3.5 g/m2. Pain secondary to cauda equina syndrome was managed with oral narcotics. Focused radiotherapy was initiated to the bony metastases but poorly tolerated. Despite whole brain irradiation and chemotherapy, progression of her LC and enlargement of the pineal gland metastasis occurred. This patient’s overall survival was three months.

Discussion▴Top 

Solid tumors such as breast cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma as well as leukemias and lymphomas can progress to leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC)-also referred to as carcinomatosis meningitis or neoplastic meningitis. A rare and devastating disease, LC consists of CSF dissemination of malignancy with invasion into the meninges [1]. Up to 20% of cancer patients with neurological symptoms will have meningeal disease on autopsy [2, 3].

Defining the primary tumor in a patient presenting with LC rarely affects the overall outcome; although, an exhaustive search should be performed as it may better define systemic chemotherapy options. The CNS disease should be managed early without delay regardless if a primary tumor is identified [4, 5]. The work up of the primary tumor in a patient with LC includes specific CSF cytopathologic investigations (immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy, molecular diagnosis) and modern imaging technology (computed tomography (CT), Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan and MRI).

In breast cancer, CNS metastases are the fourth most common distant metastatic site after the bone, lungs, and liver [6]. Among solid tumors, breast cancer invades the meninges most frequently [7]. Anywhere from 5 - 50% of patients with metastatic breast cancer will also have CNS metastases, of which up to 15% will be occult [8, 9]. Specifically, 2 - 5% of patients with breast cancer ultimately will develop LC [10]. CNS disease typically appears within two-three years after the diagnosis of metastatic disease [9-12]. It is common for most patients to have intraparenchymal brain metastases concurrent with LC [3, 7]. The overall incidence of LC appears to be increasing but this may be related to several factors including more sensitive neurological imaging, improved overall survival, and increased awareness by clinicians [11, 12].

As systemic therapies and overall survival improve, likely more patients with metastatic breast cancer will develop LC. Patients at high risk include those with HER2/neu expressing tumors, especially those treated with trastuzumab (Herceptin™) compared to traditional chemotherapy [7]. This phenomenon is thought to be due to three factors: predilection of HER2/neu expressing tumors for spread to the CNS; poor penetration of trastuzumab through the blood brain barrier; and improved visceral disease control with overall longer survival allowing for late CNS spread [6]. Other risk factors include estrogen receptor negative tumors [13] and younger patients with aggressive tumors. The median age of these patients is typically five years younger than that of patients who present with metastatic disease but without CNS involvement [14, 15].

The presentation of LC is due to symptoms from the obstruction of normal CSF flow, local tumor infiltration, alteration in the metabolism of the CNS, or a combination of these factors [12]. Only 5 - 10% of patients will present with CNS disease as the first manifestation of cancer [14, 15]. These symptoms include focal neurologic deficits, pain and radiculopathies from local infiltration into the brain or spinal cord, seizures, encephalopathy, hydrocephalus, and infarcts related to occlusion of intracranial blood vessels. Typically, neurologic imaging and CSF examination will make the diagnosis [3]. The reported sensitivity for contrast enhanced MRI is 60 - 75% for LC [16, 17]. CSF findings may include a low glucose and positive cytology-an absolute criterion for diagnosis. The sensitivity of CSF cytology approaches 98% when three or more separate samples are examined [18]. Tumor markers in CSF specimens can aid in the identification of the primary tumor. CSF flow studies are helpful in those patients who are asymptomatic and in whom radiographic imaging is unclear. These flow studies may also be helpful in determining if intrathecal therapy is a feasible therapeutic option [19-21]. However, because of the overall poor sensitivity and specificity, CSF studies make for a poor evaluator of response to therapy. In patients whose radiographic and CSF studies are non-diganostic and there is no systemic manifestation of disease, a meningeal biopsy from an MRI-enhancing area may be diagnostic [22].

Typically, spread to the CNS is diagnosed in the last weeks to months of life in metastatic breast cancer. Without treatment, median survival is 4 - 6 weeks. With treatment, median survival is 4 - 13 months [1, 7, 23-25]. Half of breast cancer patients with CNS metastases die from the neurologic disease despite their systemic disease under reasonable control. In contrast, other solid tumor patients with CNS involvement typically succumb to systemic disease [7]. This phenomenon is thought to be due to the chemosensitive nature of breast cancer [14, 15, 26, 27]. For example, treatment of HER2/neu over-expressing tumors with antibody therapy (trastuzumab) has led to better control of systemic disease while leaving the CNS disease relatively under-treated. Because of the concern for neurologic progression with systemic stability, treatment of the CNS disease is paramount to improving overall survival.

For secondary brain malignancies, especially those due to spread of solid tumors, whole brain irradiation (WBI) is considered the standard treatment and shown to improve overall survival by weeks to months; it also can be effective treating LC [23, 28]. Combined treatment with WBI and intrathecal therapy improves clinical symptoms but not necessarily overall survival [29, 30]. If there is poor, altered, or obstructed CSF flow, intrathecal therapy will be less effective [19-21]. Intravenously delivered chemotherapy penetrates the CNS poorly due to the blood brain barrier but may be combined with intrathecal chemotherapy [1, 31]. In those patients with HER2/neu expressing tumors, there may be some benefit in intrathecal administration of trastuzumab. With systemic administration of trastuzumab, there is poor concentration of the drug in the CSF; the concentration can be improved by direct intrathecal administration [32].

There are several key prognostic indicators that are useful in determining who should be aggressively treated for LC and who should be offered best supportive care (BSC). Poor prognostic indicators include age > 55 years, lung metastases, cranial nerve involvement, CSF glucose < 325 mmol/l, CSF protein 0.51 - 1.0 g/l, and World Health Organization Performance Status > 3 [33, 34]. Positive CSF cytologic findings do not appear to affect overall prognosis or survival [35]. Other groups found to have limited benefit from LC-directed care include those with bulky subarachnoid or parenchymal CNS metastatic disease, radiotherapy-resistant interruption of CSF flow, and LC-related encephalopathy [20, 35]. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) stratifies patients into low and high risk groups using comparable criteria [36]. Patients defined as having poor prognostic factors benefit more from BSC than from aggressive LC-directed treatment. Care for these patients can include anti-epileptic drugs, anxiolytics, antidepressents and narcotics for pain control [37].

At present, the treatment of LC is inadequate. Leptomeningeal disease is a serious and life threatening manifestation of late metastatic breast cancer. A high index of suspicion in any cancer patient with neurologic symptoms must be maintained. As our systemic therapies continue to improve overall survival and reduce tumor burden, the ability for the CSF to act as a sanctuary for tumor cells increases. It is imperative to determine if there are newer treatment modalities that can target these tumor cells after they have crossed the blood brain barrier. In addition, defining the subset of the population that may benefit from aggressive screening and treatment will aid in the development of future clinical trials.

Disclosures

No Disclosures.

Conflict of Interest

No Conflicts of Interest.


References▴Top 
  1. Chamberlain MC. Neoplastic meningitis. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2005;23(15):3605-3613.
    pubmed
  2. Posner J (ed): “Neurologic Complications of Cancer.” Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company, 1995.
  3. Glass JP, Melamed M, Chernik NL, Posner JB. Malignant cells in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF): the meaning of a positive CSF cytology. Neurology. 1979;29(10):1369-1375.
    pubmed
  4. Nguyen LN, Maor MH, Oswald MJ. Brain metastases as the only manifestation of an undetected primary tumor. Cancer. 1998;83(10):2181-2184.
    pubmed doi
  5. Bartelt S, Lutterbach J. Brain metastases in patients with cancer of unknown primary. Journal of neuro-oncology. 2003;64(3):249-253.
    pubmed doi
  6. Lee YT. Breast carcinoma: pattern of recurrence and metastasis after mastectomy. American journal of clinical oncology. 1984;7(5):443-449.
    pubmed doi
  7. Bendell JC, Domchek SM, Burstein HJ, Harris L, Younger J, Kuter I, Bunnell C, et al. Central nervous system metastases in women who receive trastuzumab-based therapy for metastatic breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2003;97(12):2972-2977.
    pubmed doi
  8. Miller KD WT, Haney LG. Occult central nervous system involvement in patients with metastatic breast cancer: prevalence, predictive factors, and impact on survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001;69:240a.
  9. Lai RK, Dang C, Thaler H. The incidence of brain metastases in Her2neu stage IV breast cancer patients. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2001;666a.
  10. Yap HY, Yap BS, Tashima CK, DiStefano A, Blumenschein GR. Meningeal carcinomatosis in breast cancer. Cancer. 1978;42(1):283-286.
    pubmed doi
  11. Amer MH. Chemotherapy and pattern of metastases in breast cancer patients. Journal of surgical oncology. 1982;19(2):101-105.
    pubmed doi
  12. Grossman SA, Krabak MJ. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Cancer treatment reviews. 1999;25(2):103-119.
    pubmed doi
  13. Maki DD, Grossman RI. Patterns of disease spread in metastatic breast carcinoma: influence of estrogen and progesterone receptor status. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology. 2000;21(6):1064-1066.
    pubmed
  14. DiStefano A, Yong Yap Y, Hortobagyi GN, Blumenschein GR. The natural history of breast cancer patients with brain metastases. Cancer. 1979;44(5):1913-1918.
    pubmed doi
  15. Boogerd W, Vos VW, Hart AA, Baris G. Brain metastases in breast cancer; natural history, prognostic factors and outcome. Journal of neuro-oncology. 1993;15(2):165-174.
    pubmed doi
  16. Chamberlain MC, Sandy AD, Press GA. Leptomeningeal metastasis: a comparison of gadolinium-enhanced MR and contrast-enhanced CT of the brain. Neurology. 1990;403 Pt 1:435-438.
    pubmed
  17. Straathof CS, de Bruin HG, Dippel DW, Vecht CJ. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and cerebrospinal fluid cytology in leptomeningeal metastasis. Journal of neurology. 1999;246(9):810-814.
    pubmed doi
  18. Glantz MJ, Cole BF, Glantz LK, Cobb J, Mills P, Lekos A, Walters BC, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid cytology in patients with cancer: minimizing false-negative results. Cancer. 1998;82(4):733-739.
    pubmed doi
  19. Grossman SA, Trump DL, Chen DC, Thompson G, Camargo EE. Cerebrospinal fluid flow abnormalities in patients with neoplastic meningitis. An evaluation using 111indium-DTPA ventriculography. The American journal of medicine. 1982;73(5):641-647.
    pubmed doi
  20. Chamberlain MC, Corey-Bloom J. Leptomeningeal metastases: 111indium-DTPA CSF flow studies. Neurology. 1991;41(11):1765-1769.
    pubmed
  21. Glantz MJ, Hall WA, Cole BF, Chozick BS, Shannon CM, Wahlberg L, Akerley W, et al. Diagnosis, management, and survival of patients with leptomeningeal cancer based on cerebrospinal fluid-flow status. Cancer. 1995;75(12):2919-2931.
    pubmed doi
  22. Cheng TM, O'Neill BP, Scheithauer BW, Piepgras DG. Chronic meningitis: the role of meningeal or cortical biopsy. Neurosurgery. 1994;34(4):590-595, discussion 596.
    pubmed doi
  23. Mahajan A, Borden J, Tsai JS. Carcinomatous meningitis: are surgeryand gamma knife radiosurgery treatment risk factors?. Journal of neurosurgery. 2002;97(5 Suppl):441-444.
    pubmed
  24. Fokstuen T, Wilking N, Rutqvist LE, Wolke J, Liedberg A, Signomklao T, Fernberg JO. Radiation therapy in the management of brain metastases from breast cancer. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2000;62(3):211-216.
    pubmed doi
  25. Fizazi K, Asselain B, Vincent-Salomon A, Jouve M, Dieras V, Palangie T, Beuzeboc P, et al. Meningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast carcinoma. Clinical features, prognostic factors, and results of a high-dose intrathecal methotrexate regimen. Cancer. 1996;77(7):1315-1323.
    pubmed doi
  26. Hagemeister FB Jr, Buzdar AU, Luna MA, Blumenschein GR. Causes of death in breast cancer: a clinicopathologic study. Cancer. 1980;46(1):162-167.
    pubmed doi
  27. Zimm S, Wampler GL, Stablein D, Hazra T, Young HF. Intracerebral metastases in solid-tumor patients: natural history and results of treatment. Cancer. 1981;48(2):384-394.
    pubmed doi
  28. Eichler AF, Loeffler JS. Multidisciplinary management of brain metastases. The oncologist. 2007;12(7):884-898.
    pubmed doi
  29. Wasserstrom WR, Glass JP, Posner JB. Diagnosis and treatment of leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: experience with 90 patients. Cancer. 1982;49(4):759-772.
    pubmed doi
  30. Chamberlain MC. Neoplastic meningitis. The oncologist. 2008;13(9):967-977.
    pubmed doi
  31. Grossman SA, Finkelstein DM, Ruckdeschel JC, Trump DL, Moynihan T, Ettinger DS. Randomized prospective comparison of intraventricular methotrexate and thiotepa in patients with previously untreated neoplastic meningitis. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 1993;11(3):561-569.
    pubmed
  32. Stemmler HJ, Schmitt M, Harbeck N, Willems A, Bernhard H, Lassig D, Schoenberg S, et al. Application of intrathecal trastuzumab (Herceptintrade mark) for treatment of meningeal carcinomatosis in HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. Oncology reports. 2006;15(5):1373-1377.
    pubmed
  33. Boogerd W, Hart AA, van der Sande JJ, Engelsman E. Meningeal carcinomatosis in breast cancer. Prognostic factors and influence of treatment. Cancer. 1991;67(6):1685-1695.
    pubmed doi
  34. Casimir M YH, DiStefano A, Hottobagyi GN, Blumenschein GR. The influence of combined modality treatment of the survival of breast cancer patients with brain metastases. Proc ASCO. 1981:1442.
  35. Chamberlain MC, Johnston SK. Neoplastic meningitis: survival as a function of cerebrospinal fluid cytology. Cancer. 2009;115(9):1941-1946.
    pubmed doi
  36. Brem SS, Bierman PJ, Black P, Blumenthal DT, Brem H, Chamberlain MC, Chiocca EA, et al. Central nervous system cancers: Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN. 2005;3(5):644-690.
    pubmed
  37. Chamberlain MC. Leptomeningeal metastasis. Current opinion in neurology. 2009;22(6):665-674.
    doi


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


World Journal of Oncology is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

     

Journal of clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 

 

 

 

World Journal of Oncology, bimonthly, ISSN 1920-4531 (print), 1920-454X (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.            
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.wjon.org   editorial contact: editor@wjon.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.